On 2008-08-02 23:38:41 +0100, "dennis@home"
said:



"Andy Hall" wrote in message news:4894d5ec@qaanaaq...
On 2008-08-02 22:42:59 +0100, Andy Burns
said:

On 02/08/2008 22:35, Andy Hall wrote:

Would you still have the same opinion had it been you that had been the
patient in cardiac arrest with a few minutes before permanent brain
damage would have set in?

Presumably in this case having to stop after the accident negated the
time saved by speeding?

Only because a dog was involved.

Had you been the patient, what action would you have liked?


I'm sure you would have kids and other innocents run down to get to you.
However most would prefer the driver to take a bit more care.

We don't have the full details other than that there was plenty of
signaling that an emergency vehicle was approaching. This is not the
same as any old car driving along.

Answer the question. If you had been the patient, would you have
preferred the ambulance to get to you quickly or would you have
preferred to be dead?