On Jul 21, 9:23*am, stuart noble wrote:
PP damp faq:
http://periodpropertyshop.co.uk/phpB...pic.php?t=6777

Seems to be just a series of edicts from your goodself

FWIW the thread is a quick summary of the position of the main
societies of expertise in the PP (period property) field. Yes the
treatment of damp in PPs continues to be controversial in some
respects. If you want to get into the subject deeper, each point made
in that FAQ is discussed in much more depth on the pp forum, you only
need ask and read. Some of course never do that - what's new.


NT