"Tom Gardner" wrote in message
...

"Ed Huntress" wrote in message
...

"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:48:02 -0400, with neither quill nor qualm, "Ed
Huntress" quickly quoth:


"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:48:20 -0400, with neither quill nor qualm, "Tom
Gardner" quickly quoth:


"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
news:08gu7458e3ppd6da2kuaiorus3m70nma72@4ax. com...
snip

You guys are sure giving that union troll a lot of air time...again.


Ron is a troll and he knows unions are a hot-button with many here so,
he
wins!

The wise man stops to think before typing.

I don't think that Ron is a troll so much as a prosyletizer. And,
considering this crowd, he's in the lion's den.

I don't believe he'd be back for more if he weren't a troll, sir.

He's not starting conversations. He's laying out his "evidence." Think of
him as a persistent proselytizer. g



OTOH, he's about the only one here who promotes the other side of the
story.
And there are two sides to it. You just don't like to hear it.

"Promotes"? Methinks you misspelled "lies about", Ed. He praises
unions, the Army says "See the world!", and religious fanatics talk
about "heaven", as if there's nothing else to life. Nah, don't want to
hear about it, thanks.

That's what I mean.

--
Ed Huntress


Come on Ed, the only thing missing from Ron's pontificating is 72 virgins!

Overall, Ron is a little less than half right. That's about the same
percentage as the anti-union set delivers here. It's also about par for
people pontificating about history and economics when they were bored stiff
in history class and never read the books, and have spent maybe an hour of
their lives studying economics.

--
Ed Huntress