View Single Post
  #45   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
Bud-- Bud-- is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,981
Default "chain" surge suppressers?

w_tom wrote:
On Jul 16, 1:26 pm, bud-- wrote:
Poor w_ is insulted by reality.
...
The required statement of religious belief in earthing. Ho-hum - read
the quote at the top.
....
The IEEE Emerald book ("IEEE Recommended Practice for Powering and
Grounding Sensitive Electronic Equipment"), an IEEE standard, recognizes
plug-in suppressors as an effective protection device. This is the most
appropriate IEEE standard for protecting electronics.

Poor w_’s religious blinders prevent him from seeing anything that
conflicts with his religious belief in earthing.


The IEEE says more than Bud's half truths.

..
Never explained:
- Why do the only 2 examples of protection in the IEEE guide use plug-in
suppressors?
- Why does the IEEE guide says in its example "the only effective way of
protecting the equipment is to use a multiport protector"?
- How would a service panel suppressor provide any protection in the
IEEE guide example?
- Why does the IEEE Emerald book recognize plug-in suppressors as effective?
..
Bud will say anything to avoid what even his NIST citation says:

..
What does the NIST guide really say about plug-in supprssors?
"One effective solution is to have the consumer install" a multiport
plug-in suppressor.
..
Bud again refused to provide a manufacturer spec that claims
protection.

..
Ho-hum. Provided and ignored, as usual.
..
A protector is only as effective as its
earth ground

..
The required statement of religious belief in earthing.

Still never seen - a source that say plug-in suppressors are NOT
effective. Poor w_ can’t even find anyone who agrees with him on the
internet.

Still never answered - embarrassing questions:
- Why do the only 2 examples of protection in the IEEE guide use plug-in
suppressors?
- Why does the NIST guide says plug-in suppressors are "the easiest
solution"?
– Why does SquareD say "electronic equipment may need additional
protection by installing plug-in [suppressors] at the point of use."
- Why does the IEEE guide says in its example "the only effective way of
protecting the equipment is to use a multiport protector"?
- How would a service panel suppressor provide any protection in the
IEEE guide example?
- Why does the IEEE Emerald book recognize plug-in suppressors as effective?
– Why does the NIST guide say "One effective solution is to have the
consumer install" a multiport plug-in suppressor.

For real science read the NIST and IEEE guides. Both say plug-in
suppressors are effective.

--
bud--