Spehro Pefhany wrote:

the renowned Eeyore wrote:
Spehro Pefhany wrote:
the renowned "Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
ian field wrote:

Underwriters Laboratories?

Which logo are you seeing? A lot of crap has fake copies of the old
logo they haven't used for years. The UL rating is usually on the power
cord, not the device. http://www.bb-battery.com/UL-1logo.gif is the
current design.

That's the *component* recognition mark.

Spot on that man.


For equipment it should look more like this:
http://www.ul.com/marks_labels/mark/..._US_listed.gif

Isn't that CUL ?

Graham

Listed by UL (testing lab); tested to meet both Canadian and US
standards. With just the C, it's tested to Canadian standards. The
default (no C or US) just US standards. Simple enough.

So that's a YES then ? I had a feeling 'full' CUL whatever that might be looked
a tad different.

When will UL and CSA accept IEC standards accredited testing I wonder ? The
standards are getting ever closer. UL1950 (IT) is very little different to
IEC60950 for example now.

Graham