View Single Post
  #52   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
Eeyore Eeyore is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,770
Default What is wrong here ?



ian field wrote:

"John Fields" wrote i
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:38:01 +0100, Eeyore
John Fields wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Tom Del Rosso wrote:
"Eeyore" wrote

I FULLY recommend the IEC standards. You have to get into a kind of
'mindset' to really understand them but I had a couple of excellent
tutors and when you do, they make great sense and provide excellent
advice.

That's probably similar to the mindset you need to be ruled from
Brussels.

MORON.

Meet a few people who sit on IEC committees before babbling that
claptrap.

Our very own John Woodgate is/was one of them. Sure, they don't always
get it
100% right but by God they get it mostly right.
---
"Gott mit uns"?

Your point is ?

UL is ****. Stuff it.


---
Bend over.

Do you even know _what_ UL is?

JF


Underwriters Laboratories?


Incorporated.

The first line on their website made me chuckle.
" UL is the trusted source across the globe for product compliance." Across
America maybe.

Graham