Dan Musicant ) wrote in
news
On 24 Jun 2008 15:31:09 GMT, Jim Yanik wrote:

:Paul M. Eldridge wrote in
m:
:
: For all the panty-waists out there who whine about CFLs containing
: mercury and, in particular, those who oppose the use of energy saving
: lamps and advocate the construction of more coal-fired plants instead:
:
:why not NUCLEAR power plants? They are clean,safe,and practical.
:We'll need them anyways for plug-in electric autos.
:Good high paying jobs,too. GOOD for the economy.

Nuclear? Clean safe and practical? Huh? Ask people in Eastern Europe
about Chernobyl.

a RUSSIAN plant;they can't do anything proper except military weapon.
Then look at France and Japan...

Also, they haven't come up with a decent means of dealing with nuclear
waste. You cannot demonstrate that it's clean, safe or practical.

Dan

France and Japan have;cleanly and safely generating around 70% of their
electric power from nuclear power.

You're just trying to set Utopian,unpractical,goals to block nuclear power.

The ONLY reason the US hasn't got their waste problem settled is due to the
environuts.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net