Larry wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Larry wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Larry wrote
Rod Speed wrote
krw wrote
Rod Speed wrote
wrote
richard wrote
Would you even be able to give away any of the nearby
houses once it became common knowledge? Or, if a
realtor made efforts to conceal this fact when selling
a neighboring house, do the buyers have any recourse?
So you're a card carrying member of NIMBY huh?
Of course my scenario was hypothetical, but are you saying
you'd be fine with it if you for example had small kids and
found out you just bought a house next to someone who'd
done a stretch for pedophilia related crimes?
No, but thats the reason few places allow that sort of thing to be
publicised, where those who have been convicted are currently 'living'
Huh? Most places have laws specifically addressing pedophiles and other
sex criminals (whether they should and how it's run is another issue).
Few places allow where those are currently 'living'
to be publicised to anyone who wants to know.
Many have web sites where you can look up the names and addresses
of those convicted of sex crimes and search for any in your neighborhood.
**** all do, actually.
Well, that's where they're currently living, isn't it?
Irrelevant to what can be looked up on web sites.
How is looking up where they're currently living on a web
site irrelevant to determining where they currently live?
Never ever said anything even remotely resembling anything like that.
It's what everyone else said.
You're lying, as always.
Your lack of ability to read and comprehend is truly astounding.
Never ever could bull**** and lie its way out of a wet paper bag.
No surprise that the best it can ever manage is parasite.
Oh, and that's not only easy to claim, but your posts make it easy to substantiate.
Never ever could bull**** and lie its way out of a wet paper bag.
No surprise that the best it can ever manage is parasite.
Criminal records are public information.
But not the current location of criminals who are no longer in jail.
Or someone famous for having murdered a bunch of
people at some point because "the voices" told him to?
Why would it be any better if they had murdered just one ?
Serial murderers are the same as those who have committed "crimes of passion"?
Irrelevant to what risk you run from either sort of criminal.
It's entirely relevant!
Easy to claim, hell of a lot harder to actually substantiate that claim.
Ahh, your favorite line.
Wrong, as always.
In other words, you're conceding.
Only in your pathetic little drug crazed parasite fantasyland.
Actually, to everyone who knows you and has read this thread.
Never ever could bull**** and lie its way out of a wet paper bag.
No surprise that the best it can ever manage is parasite.
You're a joke.
And you're a lying parasite. As everyone can see.
A serial killer
It wasnt serial killers being discussed, it was those who kill a number of people at once.
Above someone used the phrase "serial murderers."
Pity that wasnt what was being discussed.
If someone used that phrase, and others responded to it, it was, ipso facto, being discussed.
Not when everyone who did respond to it pointed out that its irrelevant to what was being discussed, ****wit.
You do know that you don't get to decide what is discussed and what isn't, right?
Never ever could bull**** and lie its way out of a wet paper bag.
No surprise that the best it can ever manage is parasite.
I used "serial killers."
Pity that wasnt what was being discussed.
It was by everyone but you, fool.
Everyone can see you are lying, just like you always end up doing when
you have got done like a ****ing dinner, time after time after time.
No surprise that the best it can ever manage is parasite.
You're so blinded by your need to pick a fight
Corse you never ever do anything like that yourself, eh parasite ?
I was engaged in this discussion before you, fool,
Everyone can see you are lying, just like you always end up doing when
you have got done like a ****ing dinner, time after time after time.
No surprise that the best it can ever manage is parasite.
and I didn't pick a fight with anyone.
Everyone can see you are lying, just like you always end up doing when
you have got done like a ****ing dinner, time after time after time.
No surprise that the best it can ever manage is parasite.
that you move the goalposts just to do it, don't you?
I wasnt the one heading off on a completely irrelevancy to what was being discussed, ****wit.
Yes, actually you were.
Everyone can see you are lying, just like you always end up doing when
you have got done like a ****ing dinner, time after time after time.
No surprise that the best it can ever manage is parasite.
No wonder the best you have ever been able to manage is parasite.
is much more likely to reoffend than a guy who killed
his wife's lover after walking in on them in bed together.
Irrelevant to whether someone who has killed more than one in a single
event is more of a risk to you than someone who has just killed one.
You obviously know very little about recidivism and the sociological aspect of criminology.
You've got your dick in your hand, as always.
This is just plain common sense.
Pity it wasnt what was actually being discussed.
Just because you weren't discussing it
Nope, because thats what the OP wasnt discussing, ****wit.
Conversations and discussions evolve, moron.
This one never did, ****wit.
ALL that ever happened was you two clowns blowing both feet off VERY
spectacularly indeed and fooling absolutely no one at all in your desperate
attempts to bull**** your way out of your predicament, as always.
- or more precisely, you can't follow such a discussion
I followed what the OP was discussing fine, thanks.
- does not mean it wasn't being discussed.
I just pointed out that serial murderers were irrelevant to what was being discussed, ****wit.
You made a VERY spectacular fool of yourself when you were actually
stupid enough to claim that serial murderers are relevant to what
was actually being discussed and are now desperately attempting to
bull**** your way out of your predicament and are fooling absolutely
no one at all, as always.
The only alternative is to keep all those with mental problems locked up till they die.
Well...
Pathetic.
Another alternative is that they could come live with you.
Or you could be incarcerated with them, as you deserve to be, parasite.
This should be a laugh
We'll see...
- why do I "deserve" to be incarcerated, fool?
Because you cant bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag, ****wit.
And even if that's true,
Everyone can see for themselves that that is true.
it is a crime in your eyes?
Yep. Summary execution is the only reasonable way to deal with parasites like you.
Because I've repeatedly shown you up?
Only in your pathetic little drug crazed parasite fantasyland.
You're pathetic.
You're a lying parasite.
Easy to claim, and self-substantiating by your own posts.
Cant even manage its own lines, or anything else at all, either.
No surprise that the best its ever been able to manage is lying parasite.