No, lacking a full sized theory of everything doesn't kill physics.
It is work.

In fact, behind me, is a book I prize that details of String Theory
and M-Theory. The formula is now confined in combining these two
almost complete but overlapping theories. Once they are resolved, then
a few will have that.

But theories come up all of the time. As ideas are proved. The word
is proved, not felt like or thought to be or seems like and feels like.....

Pure science contains facts not feelings.

Martin

Martin H. Eastburn
@ home at Lions' Lair with our computer lionslair at consolidated dot net
TSRA, Endowed; NRA LOH & Patron Member, Golden Eagle, Patriot's Medal.
NRA Second Amendment Task Force Charter Founder
IHMSA and NRA Metallic Silhouette maker & member.
http://lufkinced.com/


Ned Simmons wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 21:16:57 -0500, "Martin H. Eastburn"
wrote:

Environmental Science is not a Science. It is a study and a way of being.
Biology is a Pseudo science as well.

It is treated as a science in schools and the Universities, but those of us
that are Scientists know that many of the near and pseudo sciences are not.
They try to be on the higher plain but never really fit just right.

Those with agendas tend to tag their results or methods with great names.


Why stop with biology? Lacking a Theory of Everything or Grand Unified
Theory, we might as well stop kidding ourselves and admit that physics
is also a pseudo-science.



----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---