View Single Post
  #18   Report Post  
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
Ron(UK) Ron(UK) is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 501
Default Peavey XR 886, 1997, mixer amp

Eeyore wrote:

N_Cook wrote:

For fan blown o/p devices the heatsink surely does not have to be much more
that a metal matrix for holding the devices to.


The larger area the better.


Does not have to be multifluted


That certainly helps.


or with those chisseled multi-vanes etc (sorry don't know the
generic term , end up curved )


Those increase surface area which is a GOOD THING.


or a great mass of metal for convection cooling


It most certainly DOES NOT need to have great weight. But almost none of the
colling in SR amp is classic convection anyway. What typically helps is maximum
surface area of the fins/vanes to create the best opportunity to let the heat
transfer to the air flow, but you can improve even that by 'slotting' the
'vanes' to create a slightly turbulent air flow.

Trust me I could write a lecture on the subject.



I recall many years ago that there was a 'manufacturers mod' for some
power amp or other ( dont recall which) where you had to bend all the
vanes of the heatsinks - which were like combs - away from the vertical
in various different directions to improve the marginal cooling just
that tiny bit to prevent the thermal protection tripping. Looked damn
ugly but did the trick.



What works best Graham, a thick ally heatsink with many thick fins, or a
thick ally plate with many convoluted thin sheet fins?


Ron