cw wrote in message
...
Wikipedia (you could look it up too) says:

I have and did look at that Wikipedia page. It's been my
experience that Wikipedia isn't the end-all-be-all that most
hope. There need to be some better checks and balances put in
place to assist in _verifying_ those links of "evidence"
[supporting pages]. Until then, it should not to be trusted as
an authoritative source.

(And yes, I visited some of the links cited on that entry prior
to clicking on the Wikipedia.)

The Ranger