On Mar 28, 11:12*pm, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Too_Many_Tools writes:
On Mar 27, 7:10*am, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
On Mar 26, 9:25*pm, Too_Many_Tools wrote:

Damn, nobody else giving any responses you want to respond to?

"Of the 300 aircraft inspected, 151 needed modified, he said."

So half of the airplanes were flying with substandard maintainance.

In my book, that is unacceptable.

And it is very unacceptable for the government to not have been on
this as it was going on.

The responsibility for this lies with the Republican cuts in oversight
agencies FAA.

And their budget cuts are risking the lives of your family members.

That's the thing about maintenance -- you don't *really* know it's
inadequate until something breaks. *Finding out half the fleet needs a
procedure done, when that half has been flying without incident....
sorry, just can't get worked up about how this reflects on the
Democrat-controlled Congress that sets the budgets.

Democrat-controlled?

Sorry...the Republicans are the ones who cut the budget for the
FAA...and Bush is the one who keeps the Democrats from increasing it.

But you already knew that.

Why do Republicans find it necessary to lie?

TMT