On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:30:58 -0700 (PDT), Carl
wrote:

On Mar 17, 12:14 pm, "Phil Kangas" wrote:
Yah, this guy claims to have invented a new form of
generator and claims it is not a perpetual motion
device! I'm a skeptic but here is the link so you
can decide for yourself. I'm going to keep my wallet
in my pocket......phil

http://www.nullgrav.com/index.htm


This one sentence from the web site is enough, it's a perpetual motion
machine.
"which may produce far more energy than it consumes."

Nah, it only claims it *may* be a perpetual motion machine.

Sounds like the inventor figures if he makes his claims vague enough
he *may* get away with all his investors' money. g

--
Ned Simmons