DIYbanter - View Single Post - WTC Towers: The Case For Controlled Demolition

Dave Bugg

wrote:
On Mar 14, 10:34 pm, "Dave Bugg" wrote:
wrote:
9. Using previous conspiracies as evidence to support their claims.
This argument invokes scandals like the Birmingham Six, the Bologna
station bombings, the Zinoviev letter and so on in order to try and
demonstrate that their conspiracy theory should be accorded some
weight (because it's "happened before".) They do not pause to
reflect that the conspiracies they are touting are almost always
far more unlikely and complicated than the real-life conspiracies
with which they make comparison, or that the fact that something
might potentially happen does not, in and of itself, make it
anything other than extremely unlikely.

so you are going to tell me that the warren commision and the
findings of the hsca are consistant with each other?

He isn't saying anything other than "Once a k00k, always a k00k?

so you 2 are among the 3 in 10 people that actually still think oswald
acted alone?
That is what you are saying, right?

No. What we are saying is that only a desperate k00k attempts to prove one
conspiracy with another.