"Millwright Ron" wrote in message
...
On Mar 7, 8:53 pm, "Hawke" wrote:
"Tom Gardner" wrote in message

...

"Louis Ohland" wrote in message
...
Tom, which way are union plants? More or less productive?

According to a quick Google, union plants are 14% more productive but as
Ron
says union people make 30% more money. My point is non-union shops are
more
cost effective and that says it all.

And if employers paid a fair wage and provided a clean, safe, working
environment no one would need to be a union member. What are the chances of
that happening due to the good will of businessmen? The reality is
businessmen want to return to the bad old days before unions when they
treated workers like animals. They've found it now too. By moving production
facilities overseas all the constraints imposed by unions on American
companies can be completely avoided by making third world inhabitants what
American workers were before unions. You have to hand it to business, they
never stop trying to screw their workers. The only difference is that it
isn't American workers that businesses are screwing but foreign workers.

Hawke


Until 1933, no unions, no rules: you were at the mercy of your
foreman. I could go to work at seven o'clock in the morning, and at
seven fifteen the boss would come around and say: you could come back
at three o'clock. If he preferred somebody else over you, that person
would be called back earlier, though you were there longer. It was
lousy. Degraded. You might call yourself a man if you were on the
street, but as soon as you went through the door and punched your
card, you was nothing more than a robot.

Millwright Ron
www.unionmillwright.com

The glory days of unions are gone! Today's unions are corrupt and protect poor
quality employees at the expense of good quality employees. Damn, you're thick!