f On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:28:08 GMT, "William Hayes"
f wrote:

SJR On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 05:40:32 +0000, William Hayes wrote:

If Democrats Had Any Brains...

They'd read the Constitution of the United States, Article II,
Paragraph one, wherein the sex of the President is clearly
'defined'.

SJR When that was written, women had the legal status of
SJR children. Although the Nineteenth Amendment specifies
SJR only voting rights, it has been held to include qualification
SJR for elected office, so there have been no challenges to
SJR female candidates for Congress based on the masculine
SJR pronouns in Article I. Any attempt to challenge Hillary's
SJR elegibility based on Article II would be as silly as the
SJR attempt to paint Obama as a crypto-Muslim, and
SJR would probably result in the quickest Supreme
SJR Court ruling in US history.

Supreme Court probabilites not withstanding, Amendment
20 states for the record, "if the president elect shall have failed to
qualify..."
Congress will get to pick their President of their Choice.

f Actually, "for the record," the 20'th states "then the Vice President
f elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified."

How does Hillary's running mate sound for President ?
What's his name ?? William Jefferson Clinton ??

f Since he is not running and, therefore, unlikely to have accrued
f enough elector votes to be among the top 3, he would not be in the
f list of choices Congress could chose from.

Which part did you fail to understand ?
Hillary's running mate is Bill Clinton ... or the part where you jump to
conclusions.
Either case, Article II, 19th amendment and 20th amendment are going to
make your day.
The Democrats have something up their sleeve and you're trying to ignore it.
You are Funny Stuff.