G. Morgan wrote:

SNIP HAPPENS

While I certainly do not agree with that court's decision, it set a precedent
nonetheless. I feel that if someone was dumb enough to send a letter showing
their "true colors", then it is the recipient's right to do with it as they
please.



That you are foolish enough to believe that an isolated unpulished
meorandum decision
in a district court case in Idaho, which runs contrary to over 200 years
of copyright
decisions in federal courts constitutes "precedent" for anything tlls us
more about you than you might
want us to know.

That you found the "great preceden" on the web site of the lawyer
reresenting the
plaintiff is even ore telling.

Soe ax you have to grind, luzer?