dennis@home wrote:
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
dennis@home wrote:
My beef is that the current blanket ban doesn't allow any choice
and the alleged health scares have been deliberately used to
support a campaign to demonise & punish smokers without any
scientific basis.

You are a typical addict.. any evidence that goes against your drug
is wrong. There is loads of evidence that smoking is harmful you
just choose to ignore it.

There's also loads of evidence that alcohol harms many many people -
more die from its effects each month than die in a year from heroin.
Nor can you say it only effects the users - many city centres are
near no go areas due to its abuse.

Irrelevant and typical of the junk smokers bring up to justify their
addiction.


So I just hope as a likely boozer you'll be just as in favour of a
similar restriction on that when it comes - as it will, given all
government's love of control.

There are already laws to control drunkenness and they have been
there far longer than antismoking laws.
And I know of nobody that has suffered from secondary drinking in a
pub/restaurant or cinema.

Apart from the people assaulted by drunks that is. My daughter deals with
dozens every Friday & Saturday night.

Typical of the junk RASF's bring up to justify their hysteria.


--
Dave - The Medway Handyman
www.medwayhandyman.co.uk
01634 717930
07850 597257