"nick hull" wrote in message
.. .
In article ,
"Ed Huntress" wrote:

That's too bad. Well, you can join the grumblers out in the street while
the
case is decided, then. Much of your argument is simply wrong, and the
parts
that are right are well-known to the petitioners and the respondents. The
case will be decided at the top of the steps with all of your argument as
a
backstory that's been around for many decades and that's already been
presented in the briefs.d I'll be watching it with great interest.

If enough people decide they dislike the decision on the top of the
steps they may decide to take the case into the streets. It would not
be the first time that gunfire changed a decision.

Or they may decide to amend the Constitution, which is what the founders
arranged so people wouldn't have to resort to gunfire. This isn't a regional
issue like the Whiskey Rebellion or Shay's Rebellion. This is a national
issue. That's what amendments are for.

--
Ed Huntress