Seppo Renfors wrote:


Tom McDonald wrote:

Inger E Johansson wrote:


Seppo,
Floyd asked why I am posting. Had he read and comprehended the article, he
would have had hard not realising the impact that have in the light of King
Hakon's warfleet mentioned by Olaus Magnus and the maps we discussed re. the
Northwest Passage, then he needn't be so surprised. Now he missed more than
usual or forgotten that one needs to look at all cards in the opponents hand
not only those one believe him or her to have. Thus he doesn't know what
this will lead to in the long run.

Inger E

Inger,

Not only are you abusing Floyd yourself, but you are abusing
him because you replied to Seppo's abuse without telling him to
stop it.


See there you go again!! Resorting to abusing people behind their
back! If you have something to say to me, be a MAN and say it TO ME!

But let me analyse your your claim of "abuse" you say I have engaged
in. It is exposing Floyd having used private definitions of terms
contrary to the meaning in English as well as lies. Of posting
misrepresented articles, claiming "timber boat building on greenland"
that has nothing to do with the article.

Sure I can see it being "abuse" to you...... it shows how BOGUS the
attacks are being made on Inger and that doesn't go down well with
you. Therefor you are quite prepared to malign another in your effort
at getting to Inger!!



[..]

Seppo,

Inger said that I 'abused' her when I replied to another poster
who had somehow offended her; and that my 'abuse' of her
consisted of my not berating him for his 'abuse' of her.

I then asked her if she would refrain from abusing others by
berating *your* abuse of other posters when she replied to you.
She didn't answer directly, but did answer indirectly. She
replied to a post of yours which abused another poster without
telling you to stop your abuse of the other poster. Therefore,
she also abused him. By her own definition. She clearly does
not believe that the rules she insists upon for others do not
apply to her. The Teflon Swede?

You seem to be under the delusion that you get to judge whether
your words are abusive or not. That's not the case, and you
know it. You've made it abundantly clear that the writer's own
meaning is irrelevant; it's the reader's reaction that
determines whether abuse exists or not. I saw your post as
abusive, and Inger did nothing to check your venom. Therefore
she is guilty, and should be held to account.

This isn't my invention, Seppo. You and Inger have defined the
playing field, and you have been found guilty of gratuitous
abuse of others, both directly and, equally culpably, indirectly.

Stop abusing me and others.

Tom McDonald