Eric Stevens wrote:

On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 04:10:59 GMT, Seppo Renfors
wrote:



Eric Stevens wrote:

On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 07:15:46 GMT, Seppo Renfors
wrote:

[..]

You mean to say all that history in the page I pointed to as a
starting point - is not worth looking at - or what is there to be
afraid of on that page?

When someone complained about the page you posted you said to look at
the 'gallery'. When I sad you should have directly posted the URL of
the gallery you said I should be looking at the original page.

Which one do you really mean to direct us to?

Is there some form of convention or "law" that says I cannot suggest
more than a SINGLE page as being "of interest"?

I don't know about it being a matter of convention or law, but it
certainly seems to be a matter of fact. :-)

If it is neither "convention or law" then it cannot be a "fact"
either, you know.

If you really meant to draw our attention to both pages, why didn't
you do it the first time when you had a chance?

Ahhhh.... but you see I have generously attributed a certain amount of
mental agility and self motivation to people, considering the group IS
a "sci.*" group presuming it to refer to "science" but without the
"fiction" - though certainly sci-fi people have agile minds at least
:-)

--
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------