Billy wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Billy wrote
HeyBub wrote
CJT wrote

Now, which of the candidates still in the hunt do we believe is
more blood-thirsty? Who do we think can hate more intensely?
Who is it that is not disgusted by seeing body parts of our enemies
strewn to the four corners? Who would have the no regrets over
the families of terrorists destined to wander the plains, leaving
bloody footprints in the snow, while the lamentations of the widows
and the cries of the children mix with the foul north winds?

Kinda makes you wonder how they call themselves Christians.

Shame on you! We are a pluralistic nation with no religious
qualifying test for our government employees. Check your
beliefs at the door of the Warrior Wing. Hillary said the
military requires a "suspension of disbelief." That's not true.
We want, if necessary, a suspension of BELIEF (plus someone
who enjoys a job well done as he disembowels the enemy).

And how Mr. Blood-n-Guts do we identify the enemy? Is it those
identified by an election stealing, draft dodging, mentally inferior
Commander in Chief or, do you just make it up as you go along?

My point is that the tax payers who pay for your "services" want PEACE so we
can raise our kids, keep our jobs, and watch Super Bowl on 40" flat screens.

They also wanted some action in response to 9/11 and
without those prepared to do that sort of thing, the US
wouldnt have been able to do anything about Afghanistan etc.

Your life style makes it hard to go get the beer.

And your mentality makes it hard to ensure that 9/11 wont be repeated.

You wont care about the beer if some terrorists
manage to let off a dirty nuke in the US, stupid.

Marion Wayne is it?

Nope.

Look, if we want to take it to them, we can do it from 30,000
feet or sin hundred miles away. We can make them pay.

Clinton tried that approach, it doesnt work.

Boots on the ground is for oil and the military-industrial complex.

Its what worked in Afghanistan when combined with B52s etc.

If this country wasn't run by big corporations that squeeze the
last drop of blood out of third world we wouldn't be in this jam.

Mindless silly stuff. That aint what produced 9/11.

If Eisenhower had been taken seriously we wouldn't have arrived at this state.

How odd that he didnt pull out of the cold war as soon as he got to be prez.

Try reading "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" by John Perkins
or "Overthrow: America's Century of Regime Change from Hawaii
to Iraq" by Stephen Kinzer and get some idea of how this country works.

That aint how it works.

When you push people, sometimes they push back.

Yes, and sometimes like with the Japs in WW2, they had to be pushed regardless.

There was no way that 9/11 could have been avoided by american policy.

What comprehensively ****ed off the stupid ragheads like bin Laden was
that it took america to **** over Saddam in the first Gulf War and prevent
him not only invading Kuwait, but Saudi etc once he had done that.

And you want to sing "America the Beautiful" and pretend
that we are what you see on the Disney Channel?

Nope, I realise that without the military system, that Saddam would
have been able to do anything he wanted once he had decided that
he was going to invade Kuwait and that his occupation of Saudi etc
is about the last thing the west needed at that time.

And it would have been even more stupid to do nothing about the terrorist training
camps in Afghanistan, whatever fools like you would have done about them.