Thread: Retraining
View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
Ed Huntress Ed Huntress is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,529
Default Retraining


"Tim Wescott" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:19:45 -0500, Ed Huntress wrote:

An article in today's NYT...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/ma...n-lede-t.html?

ref=magazine

...finally gives some concrete answers to the question of what
manufacturing workers should be retraining for, if they're expecting to
work in a growing sector of the economy:

"Why do presidential candidates touting their concern for the economy
pose with factory workers rather than with ballet troupes? After all,
the U.S. now has more choreographers (16,340) than metal-casters
(14,880), according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. More people make
their livings shuffling and dealing cards in casinos (82,960) than
running lathes (65,840), and there are almost three times as many
security guards (1,004,130) as machinists (385,690). Whereas 30 percent
of Americans worked in manufacturing in 1950, fewer than 15 percent do
now. The economy as politicians present it is a folkloric thing."

So, the answer is clear: It's time to learn to dance or shuffle.
Practice those pirouettes, and always deal from the top of the deck,
ya'll.

http://www.wikihow.com/Do-a-Pirouette


Bleh.

OTOH, those 15 percent are more likely to be good at what they do. I bet
a lot of those mill operators in the '50s just knew how to work at the
level of "turn the big handle over there until the number 55 is on top"
where the ones that are left can not only build to print just fine, but
hand you back a print with redlines to make the part better or less
expensive to build.


Maybe. Maybe not. There are lots of former machine operators who are
flipping burgers today, but the 15% you're talking about includes everyone.


There's another thing to consider, if I'm not mistaken: The federal
agency that tracks these things classifies ones job as a "service job" if
one isn't actually putting stuff together with ones own hands -- so if
you hold a job as an engineer, draftsman, planner, or any other vital job
that requires practical experience and knowledge but doesn't have you
touching the machines, then you're not considered to be "manufacturing"
anything.


It's just the opposite. They count everyone who works for a company that has
a manufacturing or manufacturing service (machine shops, custom molders,
etc.) NAICS code. They don't miss much. And that includes salesmen and
office clerks who work for manufacturing companies.


That 15% of folks who are actually running the machines and bolting
things together aren't standing out in the forest picking raw materials
off the trees, and there aren't any shy woodland creatures carrying the
finished product to market -- so "manufacturing" is bigger than the feds
make out.


Yeah, it includes the people who carry the finished product to market -- as
long as they work for the company. Independent trucking firms aren't
included. Neither are people out picking things off of trees. g

The percentage of people who work in manufacturing is simply down, Tim. That
should be no surprise. What surprised me is how many choreographers we have.
I don't really see that much dancing going on.

--
Ed Huntress