"Gunner" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:15:40 -0500, "Stormin Mormon"
wrote:



Technically, no. But in reality, yes. That's because he and his advisors
don't believe that the Constitution actually limits them in any way. So
they
do whatever they want even though it's unconstitutional and then see if
anyone is willing to do anything to stop them. So far no one has so it
works
out that Bush has had the authority to do anything he wants. It's not
constitutional but it seems that's besides the point. The Constitution
only
limits the government if all the branches decide to abide by it. The
republicans have decided they only obey the Constitution when it's
convenient.

Hawke

so you are claiming that the Majority Democrats dont have the balls to
stop him? That they are utter and total pussies?

Idiot. Having a majority doesn't let you override a veto, or a slam-dunk
threatened veto.

What you have is a bunch of dead-ender conservative Republicans from the
flaming red states who will jerk their knees in Bush's direction rather than
think for themselves. That's why you have deadlock on a lot of issues.

--
Ed Huntress

--
Ed Huntress