Lumpy wrote:
Lumpy:
Ah another public plonking.
That works so well to demonstrate the
tolerance level of the plonker.

Doug Miller:
I presume you'll be making the same criticism
of 'GarageWoodworks', who also publicly plonked
Twerp at the same time for the same reason...

Pretty much of anyone who is afraid to read something
they don't agree with, and feels the need to demonstrate
the histrionics of the public plonk. It's the NG equiv
of taking your toys and going home.

It's not a matter of being "afraid", it's a matter of deciding not to
associated with a particular individual.

Your sig is malformed. It should be preceded by two hyphens,
a blank, and a newline so that conforming newsreaders
automatically recognize it as a sig and
do not quote it on followup.

Plonk me and you won't be bothered any longer?

If you're going to be confrontational about a suggestion that you
bring your sig into compliance with accepted practice then it's not
lookin' too good.


--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)