On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 16:44:42 GMT, Gunner
wrote:


Of course I admit that the Republican party has a number of negatives
about it. Indeed. Which is why Im a Republitarian.

I'm surprised they let you join. Aren't they the guys who believe
government should have very few obligations, none of which are writing
checks for Gunnervision HQ staff?

Im very much pro choice. If RU-384 was available over the counter, Id
not bitch.

Look how many posts you wrote on the topic before fessing up with that
sniveling endorsement. Sheesh! Seems like something you'd be
wholeheartedly in support of, *if* you really were "very pro choice".
Seems you're more anti-dem than pro anything.

I noticed a distinct lack of comment
from you on my "illogic" when I ran it through the ladder.

So much contradiction and foolishness, so little time. But I'm glad
you brought up missing responses... where are yours about drug
reimportation? How will you pay for your drugs if the GOP is able to
enforce the ban on reimportation, and the price about doubles? How
many paragraphs of GOP sheeple **** will you write before admitting
you're against that ban?

Where in my posts did I mention money? I did indicate that adoption
was a very viable solution for some women.

Of course it's viable for some. And I'm not surprised you need the
connection between money and your position spelled out. Do you think
the majority of mothers who are only continuing unwanted pregnancies
because they didn't have a practical alternative, are likely to be
paying their hospital bills? And if adoption is so practical, then why
are there so many foster homes, and armies of social service workers
to supervise them? How is any of that more practical than a pill?

If cost was the issue, ammo is cheap, and simply putting a $.02 22lr
round in the back of your daughters neck at the skull junction is very
cheap. Far cheaper than an abortion, even when its paid for by the
State.

Ah yes, a classic Gunnervision tactic: ignore one major component
(nine months of pregnancy and a hospital bill), leave out a practical
option (the cost of a pill), and substitute some drama-queen
foolishness in their place. sigh Regardless, exactly how does
anything cost less just because the price is paid by the State?


Wayne