HeyBub wrote:

CJT wrote:

HeyBub wrote:


BobR wrote:


Hell, things were so bad during the Carter fiasco that we measured
life with a misery index. Some people were either too young to
really remember how bad it was or they simply choose to forget
because it doesn't fit their desire to put down Bush. Bush is by
no measure a GREAT President but he is far from the worst. I can
name at least three during my lifetime who were worse. Carter was
by far the worse, Nixon ran a distant second and Johnson followed
Nixon.


I suggest that the country was so disgusted with the seemingly
corrupt, but

"Seemingly corrupt?!?!?!" How can there be any doubt?



competent, Nixon that they picked a righteous, though incompetent,
replacement.


Inasmuch as I was working for the government, in Washington, at the time (AA
for a U.S. Senator, fresh from a tour in Viet Nam as a FSO), there was great
doubt. The Democrats, as is and was their want, blow things out of
proportion: a small-time break-in, global warming, etc. While the
Republicans only get exercised over grave threats to the republic, high
crimes and misdemeanors, such as Clinton's folly.


Surely you jest. "Small time break-in??"

And how does consensual sex with an adult constitute a "high crime?"

--
The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam. Our true address is of the form .