On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 06:47:53 GMT, Gunner
wrote:

On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 19:29:15 GMT, wmbjk
wrote:

On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:03:58 GMT, Gunner
wrote:


Got a good practical solution. Adoption. Or simply use birth
control. Or..dont ****.

Oh yeah, real practical, those methods have worked so well thus
far....

Face it, there are always going to be unwanted pregnancies. What kind
of fool prefers them to morning after pills? The good sheeple kind,
the loyal party foot-soldier, er... chair soldier. And of course one
of the most beloved party planks is that there's unlimited money to
pay for all those unwanted kiddies, hospital bills .... oops, there
seems to be a flaw in your plan. Will they kick you out for that, or
just award you more demerit points?

Wayne

And this means what?

Gunner

It means that you'd rather waste your life and your health writing
reams of contradictory nonsense in the delusional belief that's
"effective", instead of just admitting that some of your party's
policy is not in the public's interest. Blocking the way to easy
availability of morning after pills, and making prescription drug
reimportation illegal, are two good examples. If you disagree with the
leadership on either of these issues, you've gone miles out of your
way to avoid saying so, which is to be expected from a good little
loyal chair soldier. In the process, we've been treated to your
money-is-no-object opinion that adoption is a "practical" solution to
unwanted pregnancy.

Wayne