Thread: Part P needed?
View Single Post
  #29   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
John Rumm John Rumm is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25,191
Default Part P needed?

Ian White wrote:
Rob Hamadi wrote:
On Jan 9, 2:27 pm, John Rumm wrote:
bof wrote:
In message , Owain
writes
John Rumm wrote:
Brian wrote:
worry? If anyone does ask, well it was done years ago, wasn't it?
Just don't look too close at the date stamps ;-)

That's not a problem, if the work was like-for-like replacement of
something installed before Part P.

Nice get out clause.

Unless you mean the date stamp on that nice shiny CU...


Which replaced the manky old CU....


Which had somehow become "damaged"...


Alas like for like swaps of a CU are not exempt from notification.


--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/