Rob Hamadi wrote:
On Jan 9, 2:27 pm, John Rumm wrote:
bof wrote:
In message , Owain
writes
John Rumm wrote:
Brian wrote:
worry? If anyone does ask, well it was done years ago, wasn't it?
Just don't look too close at the date stamps ;-)

That's not a problem, if the work was like-for-like replacement of
something installed before Part P.

Nice get out clause.

Unless you mean the date stamp on that nice shiny CU...

Which replaced the manky old CU....

Which had somehow become "damaged"...

Oh look - there's a damaged cable too...


--
Ian White