Thread: Part P needed?
View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
Terry Fields Terry Fields is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 854
Default Part P needed?


John Rumm wrote:

Brian wrote:

Well, I would just go ahead and do it as long as you know what you are
doing (for safety's sake). Since no-one will ever ask about it, why


Yup, the way most would go I expect... especially as local authorities
don't seem to have got their act in order regarding signing off work set.

worry? If anyone does ask, well it was done years ago, wasn't it?


Just don't look too close at the date stamps ;-)

If you want an example of how a government can really cock up
regulations, just look at part P. Now if they had spent the same time
promoting those lottle devices which find cables etc buried in walls,
they would have done far more good, and probably saved some lives too.


The real danger with part P is that some people will take it seriously,
and die as a direct result.


Hasn't the number of deaths from unsafe domestic installations gone up
since Prat P came in?