Thread: PIR v Dawn Dusk
View Single Post
  #13   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
The Medway Handyman The Medway Handyman is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,319
Default PIR v Dawn Dusk

"The Medway Handyman" wrote in
message .uk...
Someone recently described a 500w PIR flood light as "fixing a half
bar electric fire outside".

Which has got me thinking. Especially given the unreliability of
500w halogen lamps/lights.

So, given the choice between a 500w PIR halogen & an 11w CFL dawn
dusk light - which will be cheaper to run?


I would use dusk to dawn lighting myself. That would be on for near
enough 5,000 hours per annum, which would use the same electricity as
a 500W PIR controlled lamp running for 18 minutes each night. So.it
all depends upon how often the PIR is likely to be triggered and how
long it is set to be on for when it has been triggered.


Thats the info I was looking for. I reckon thats a good case for dawn/dusk.

....
So which one is the best deal for the customer?


Another consideration is that the PIR triggered light shows that
there is movement in the area. On a patrolled factory estate, that
can draw the attention of the guard from quite a long way off, so the
application is important in deciding which is the best to use.


True.

Personally, I prefer to have low power lamps on at all times. PIRs
can be fooled, but an always on light leaves anyone trying to break
in constantly illuminated, which is a useful deterrent in itself.


Good point.


--
Dave - The Medway Handyman
www.medwayhandyman.co.uk
01634 717930
07850 597257