Oren wrote in
:

On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 12:05:13 -0800 (PST), Harry K
wrote:

On Jan 4, 6:15*am, Jim Yanik wrote:
(Doug Miller) wrote
y.net:
In article , jJim
McLaughlin wrote:
Jim Yanik wrote:
SNIP
I would have just shot the robber;2 rounds to the center of
body.

You might want to think about that. *Incident was in Indiana,
IIRC, not Texas.

Not a problem. Indiana law allows the use of deadly force not only
in self-defense, but in the defense of others also.

these days,robbers often shoot people *after they have complied*,for
no reason,and witnesses or bystanders too.

I'm NOT REQUIRED to act as a police officer and demand they
surrender,and it's too big a risk (and STUPID!!) to let THEM have
the first shot.

Their drawing and threatening with a gun puts me at risk just as
much as the one they are pointing the gun at.
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net- Hide quoted text -


Case of idiot civilians bitchign about cops use of force.

Spokane, WA last Friday (IIRC) vehicl chase, ends in foot pursuit,
perp cornered, pulls gun, gun battle, perp wounded.

No problem? Guess again.

News last night. Big uproar about the 'shoot'. People bitching about
whether the deputy fired first. Note that there is NO denial that
perp pointed his weapon at the deputy before the fun started.

Guess they think the perp should get a free first shot and return fire
is only to be directed at shooting the gun out of his hand.

I shouldn't be by now but I am constantly amazed at how stupid people
can be.

Harry K

Sounds like a Civilian Review Board (CRB) wanting to meddle in police
business. In Las Vegas we have a Coroner's Inquest to review
shootings by Police. Under Oath.

Note to self:

1) Dead perps don't testify

2) Don't let the facts interfere with a good report

Oren
--


I see nothing wrong with a civilian review board.(properly
trained/educated)
After all,the police DO work for US.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net