clifto wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

"Jim Yanik" wrote in message
. ..

"Dave Bugg" wrote in
:


BobR wrote:

On Jan 1, 2:40 pm, krw wrote:

In article , alt.home.repair,
says...


krw wrote:

You're an idiot. Lieberman also wants to *WIN* the war in Iraq and
is 100% behind the President in his efforts. Are you all for that
too?

Sure. Doesn't everybody?

NO!


"WIN" is so amporhous a concept, it's something that everybody can
get behind.

No, apparently it's not. The democrats are fully invested in
losing, being the losers they are.

--
Keith

Yes and No, The Democrats are fully invested in BUSH losing. A
subtle difference but an important difference that needs to be
understood.

Huh...., I didn't know Bush was running for anything. Shouldn't
someone tell all those investing Democrats?


the DemocRATs have decided that America is a "bad guy",and must surrender
to the Islamics and socialism.The Democrats are run by nutcases like
Howard
Dean,Michael Moore,George Soros.DemocRATs are weak on national defense.

--
Jim Yanik


What do you mean by "weak on national defense"? Do you have proof, at least
15 kinds? Let's see your proof. Less than 15 equals nothing.


Democrats don't believe in national defense at all. They believe that
large amounts of money given to enemies of the USA will prevent those
enemies from opposing us.

You are SO full of baloney!

--
The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam. Our true address is of the form .