"HeyBub" wrote in message
...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:



This isn't a question of party affiliation. It's an example of how
*ALL* politicians are indebted in some way to corporate sponsors.
There are NO exceptions. None.

I agree, and that's the way it should be.

The powerful and affluent act as a brake on the mindless roar of the
unwashed masses. It's a check-and-balance, a division of labor.


There's a big difference between taking care of your constituents, and being
paid in various ways to look the other way when wrong is being done by your
contributors.