"Dave Bugg" wrote in message
...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"clifto" wrote in message
...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Kurt Ullman" wrote...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
Why do you say the idea is wrong? The insurance industry has
already purchased the necessary politicians to do its bidding.

Can't talk for the OP, but to my mind, this is a way of
placing blame without really thinking about the why. It is way too
simplistic and pretty much used as a way to avoid actually making
any effort to actually understand the underlying causes. It is
used often by merely changing the name of the industry or group
that has bought the politicians.

If a president said he wanted legislation that banned the sale of
all military equipment to other countries, what do you suppose
would happen in
the ensuing months after he made that statement?

Democrat or Republican?


Either way. Gimme both of your guesses.

The candidate from any party who represent true conservative principals
that embrace libertarian values? Eschewing the radical extreme of either
party for original Constitutional intent?

--
Dave


That's basically the idea. We can dream, but because people are people, I
don't think we'll ever see this.

Don't say Ron Paul. Please.