"Santa Cruz Mike" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:28:56 -0700, "SteveB"
wrote:


I would seek a TRO if and when I think Gunner plans to do what TROs
are
designed to head off: someone lingering on or near another person's
property for threatening or harassment purposes. TROs are orders for
another to keep a reasonable distance, allowing arrest and prosecution
if they violate the TRO.

--Tim May

Please, please, please. Can I go down to the courthouse or police
station
with you when you ask them to put a TRO on a man that had heart surgery
within the last week.

It has been a long long time since I have laughed that hard, and I want
to
be there when it happens.

Please, please, please?

Steve ......................... PLEASE?


Steve... get a bigger laugh... don't need to make a trip.. it's a
felony to threaten anyone in an email, newsgroup posts, etc.. just
one or two calls and over for that low life... barely living,
stranling along Gunner...

Mike


Well, there's always the clause, "reasonable and prudent person" to make
such decisions. Were this law felonious threatening enforced, I imagine
we would have heard about it by now, because in about ten years of netting
now, I have seen it hundreds of times. And NEVER heard of one arrest.

Hell, they can't do anything about spammers, child pornographers, or credit
card number snatchers, what makes you think they will go after someone who
tells another they have an attitude adjustment coming?

Kinda low on the priority totem pole, if you ask me. But, hey, we live in a
perfect world, and all things are possible.

Steve