In message , The Natural
Philosopher writes
geoff wrote:
In message , The Natural
Philosopher writes
geoff wrote:
In message , The Natural
Philosopher writes
John Rumm wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:

15. Hydrogen fuel.
If you have nuclear to make it, then it starts to be useful for
sorts - either directly or in a fuel cell to replace battery
technology.

It doesn't work as well as batteries and is a hell of a sight more
dangerous to use and store, so why bother?
because it's not a one solution fits all problem


Thatys wht we drive around on square wheels with elegantly
compensating suspenension them?

Are you Drivel in a new moniker?
You do come across as a total ****** at times, don't you


ROFLMAO!



Only case it makes sense is aircraft, but even there its a hell of
bulky stuff to cram in. Better to make synthetic kerosene.

out of what ?

Water, carbon dioxide, and energy.
Just a minute - let me rub two sticks together


whatever for?

I suppose you don't know any chemistry either.

Only up to A level


Lets see.
Cant do geography:
doesn't know that tropics are not where deserts are.

Loose definition - I wasn't being specific, I wasn't expecting such an
anal pedant. If you look at an atlas however, you'll find that the N
African desert does extend well into the equatorial region (i.e. 23
degrees)

Cant do sums and add up the costs of things.

There seem to be people with much more of a clue than yourself who think
it's viable, go read the NS article

Given that the Mediterranean is 8 miles wide at the straits of
Gibraltar, that bit's not exactly unachievable, and as large
transmission projects, how much more difficult do you think it is than
e.g. the trans-Siberian pipeline or the US national grid ?

Can't do logic.

Let me guess,.

No don't

You are a Nu Laber politician,

Told you not to

Projects like this need people with vision, not worn out, retired IT
bods who can only see "can't do's"




--
geoff