1001 things that won' t save the planet. Or even come close.
geoff wrote:
In message , The Natural
Philosopher writes
John Rumm wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
15. Hydrogen fuel.
If you have nuclear to make it, then it starts to be useful for all
sorts - either directly or in a fuel cell to replace battery technology.
It doesn't work as well as batteries and is a hell of a sight more
dangerous to use and store, so why bother?
because it's not a one solution fits all problem
Thatys wht we drive around on square wheels with elegantly compensating
suspenension them?
Are you Drivel in a new moniker?
Only case it makes sense is aircraft, but even there its a hell of a
bulky stuff to cram in. Better to make synthetic kerosene.
out of what ?
Water, carbon dioxide, and energy.
|