"geoff" wrote in message
...
In message , Arnold Walker
writes

"geoff" wrote in message
...
In message , Neon John
writes
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:02:17 -0500, "NapalmHeart"
wrote:


Why is it that people that are anti-gun ownership are so smug? Oh
well,
at least some of them are likely one mugging away from changing their
mind.

I wasn't going to get into this but....

How 'bout an a story with a happy ending, one real close to home. For
me
at least.

But then if guns hadn't been freely available to either of you the
incident wouldn't have happened. He obviously wasn't a crim, like you,
he
was a mental defective in legal possession of a firearm

sounds like there was a mental **** on each side of the door, just that
one was more sober than the other
The bottom line is that with gun control .....the homeowener would be
dead.

How do you work that out ?

neither would have had ready access to a firearm
For folks with common sense you can look at the gun control areas like New
York .
The drug freak would have a gun anyway .....if for no reason other than he
stole it off a cop in a burglary.
Burglars tend to do that at times when they break in homes and businesses.
Video equipment isn't the only thing that they take.
He was doing just that in the example.
When confronted at the door....he has a garbage line to confuse the
homeowner while he sized up the house.
When he thought the detraction worked ,pulled his gun for a forced entry.
The homeowner would be more likely to be obeying the law ,than the drug
freak that had already broke at least three laws before he even pulled the
gun.
Of course liberals like yourself think they are above the law ... and won't
understand what I said.