On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:10:45 -0800 (PST), Too_Many_Tools
wrote:

On Dec 15, 10:29 am, Don Foreman
wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:34:32 -0800, Gunner





wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 23:23:19 -0800 (PST), Too_Many_Tools
wrote:

On Dec 14, 2:31 pm, Eregon wrote:
Too_Many_Tools wrote in news:a927ebf6-a114-4c4f-
:

The Problem is that irresponsible people have access to weapons.

Especially Politicians and badge-toters.

Fix that problem and the innocent will stop dying.

Not very bloody likely!

You seem to forget that more people die from illness, automobiles, old age,
etc., than from any weapon usage.

Requiring psych testing for gun ownership and usage would be a good
first step.

Most Pshrinks are nuts - are you REALLY saying that you want a nutcase to
be the one that makes the decision?

SEVERE penalties for allowing others unauthorized access to your
weapons would be another.

Given the co$t of firearms these days, the penalty for Grand Theft already
applies since UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS denotes theft.

Are you REALLY saying that the person whose firearm, knife, ball bat, hunk
of rebar, 2x4, etc. was stolen should be IMPRISONED or FINED? If so, you
must be a Pshrink.

We are talking about responsible gun ownership.

You ARE for RESPONSIBLE gun ownership, aren't you?

Don't PLAY the game unless you can PAY admission.

TMT

Responsible gun ownership to an antigunner such as TooFew, is placing
your firearms in the middle of 20 cubic food of wet concrete and
watching it dry.

Gunner

It means nothing at all to him other than as a swell hotbutton for
trolling. - Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You could not be more wrong Don.

You might want to step back and reexamine your responses...their
content is departing from your normal well balanced and thought out
nature.

OK, I did. You might want to do likewise. I see far more flame than
rational thought, and about no original thinking in your rhetoric
here. It's a ****ing contest, not a debate.

Patronize me at your peril. I try hard to be civil and even polite.