On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 20:22:20 -0500, Tanus wrote:
snip
(I wrote, but Tanus doesn't have the ability to quote me properly
saying

Lets see. So you want to defend China for shipping toxic products to
us. Why, exactly, have you chosen this specific cause as yours?
It's called "sticking to the topic of the post". You should try it.
Answer the question.

Usenet has quite a few users who twist
and turn people's words, and never back
down. You're one of them. I'm not one to
argue repeatedly about what I didn't
say. I state it once, and if the
accusation comes back to me, I just move
on. Which is what I"m doing now. See ya.

Backpedal noted. You pretend to defend chinese imported toxins until
confronted with facts. Thanks for verifying that.

However, something to consider is that
you don't win an argument by re-hashing
drivel. You just **** other people off
who might otherwise have given you
credence.

OK, so tell me specifically which recalls on productrecallwatch.com
aren't accurate. Because, if they're wrong, it's not the fault of the
messenger (me) but, the fault of the reporting entities (various). Show
your work. Or just admit that you got nothing, which anyone who keeps
current on the facts will know.

If only your point of view had ANY validity. And yet it doesn't. And
yet you defend it. Why do you try to help people trying to kill me, my
kids, and my pets?