Rod & Betty Jo wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Rod & Betty Jo wrote:
Mark & Juanita wrote:

Tis a sad country that discriminates simply because of age, health or
income.....You'd deny the vote simply because someone became ill or
disabled.....Not a world I'd choose to embrace. Rod


No - he would deny a vote because someone is living off someone
else's wallet. There is no "discrimination" involved. No one forces
any of the people in the aforementioned classes to use government as their
proxy for
stealing Other People's Money.

My point is the elderly, ill or disabled ......Indeed there are those among
us whom cannot through no fault of their own support themselves. To deny
these as less worthy to vote than those blessed with good health is quite
despicable. And I would suggest quite contrary to the basic ideals of a
freedom loving people. How with a clear conscious can one support such
arrogance? Rod



How can you support the forced redistribution of personal property by
threat of government force? I am all for helping those who are in need
by no action on their own part. I am NOT for being forced to do so with
the government's gun in my ear while some third party decides for me just
who is and who is not worthy of *my* assets.