ChairmanOfTheBored wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 07:01:12 -0600, flipper wrote:

On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 14:28:44 -0600, John Fields
wrote:

On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 08:45:43 -0800, ChairmanOfTheBored
wrote:

On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 05:13:56 -0600, John Fields
wrote:

On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:18:03 -0800, ChairmanOfTheBored
wrote:

On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:52:42 -0800, John Larkin
wrote:

On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:18:48 -0800, ChairmanOfTheBored
wrote:

On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 12:54:29 -0800, John Larkin
wrote:

http://www.onsemi.com/pub/Collateral/MC33501-D.PDF

Just what I need for the tachometer thingie.

John
Yes, that is a nice family of amplifiers. Small package too!
I tend to sort of ignore ONsemi for linears, but they really do some
nice stuff.

John

Zetex makes nice stuff that would compliment that op amp front end very
nicely.
---
Zetex nice stuff: "My, that certainly is a nice opamp!"

On Semi: "Why, thank you Zetex nice stuff, that's very kind of you
to say so!"


I must compliment you on your astoundingly complimentary comments.
---
:-)
I'm surprised that electrical engineers would fail to notice that an
uncomplimentary comment is the equal but opposite complementary to a
complementary comment so a complementary comment isn't complementary.

Technically speaking, of course.


Double negatives DO work in electronics. This isn't speech. So,
technically speaking, you are incorrect... thrice.


In the south they can do the quadruple negatives. A kid, after being
read the riot act about not punching other kids during recess: "I ain't
going to do that to nobody never no more"

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/