On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 05:22:01 -0800 (PST), Too_Many_Tools
wrote:

On Dec 12, 5:44 am, Gunner wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:19:55 -0800 (PST), Too_Many_Tools





wrote:
On Dec 11, 10:35 pm, "Pete C." wrote:
Too_Many_Tools wrote:

Actually the greatest danger from personal weapons is domestic
shootings...family members or friends shooting each other....not from
the crazy mall or church shooters.

Partly true if you're implying guns, however that ignores the fact that
nearly every one of those situations would still have happened if guns
were not available, just with different weapons. The presence of a gun
makes little difference in rates or outcomes.

Bull**** it does.

The presence of a weapon that can be used in an instance but regretted
for a lifetime makes all the difference in the world.

Anytime there is a domestic problems, the first question asked is are
the firearms out of reach...secured...locked down.

TMT

You are aware that the majority of domestic killings and woundings are
with knives?

Ill be waiting for your calls for pysch testing for knife ownership,
with bated breath.

Gunner- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Go ahead Gunner...provide the cites for your claim.

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/press/ivc98pr.htm
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/wuvc01.txt


NRA lies...I mean stats don't count.

TMT

Your bias and utter ignorance is laughed at.

Gunner