Harry K wrote in
:

On Dec 11, 9:03 am, "SteveB" wrote:
wrote in message


... On Dec 9, 11:26?pm, Tony Hwang wrote:

SteveB wrote:
I saw a clear full body picture of the Omaha shooter. ?Anyone who
had a concealed weapon and who could shoot decently could have
lessened the carnage. ?If you got a CCW, carry your weapon.

Steve

Oh, Yeah. Hand gun against AK-47. Right.
How about getting rid of all guns?

That's what they thought they were doing at Virginia Tech. It was a
"Gun-Free Zone"

There was another school in Virginia that wasn't a "Gun-Free Zone".
No deaths, gun-weilding, law-abiding cirizens held criminal gunman
for police. Very few papers mentioned the fact that he was held by
armed citizens, only that citizens held him for police. With that
kind of coverage, its no wonder people don't understand the value of
an armed populace.

And with the liberals controlling the media, it's no wonder we get
the newspeak news we get.

Steve

Then there is the incident from ?yesterday? where an ex-cop (female)
happened to be on site when it started, engaged and put the shooter
down.

I don't carry (should), but if I am ever in that position, I am going
to be praying that someone in the crowd _is_ carrying.

Harry K


IMO,more people might carry if we had nationwide Vermont-style carry laws.
No permit,carry open or concealed as you wish.
That's the way it used to be everywhere(pre early-1900s),and the way it
should be.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net