"SteveB" wrote in
news

wrote in message
.
.. On Dec 9, 11:26?pm, Tony Hwang wrote:
SteveB wrote:
I saw a clear full body picture of the Omaha shooter. ?Anyone who
had a concealed weapon and who could shoot decently could have
lessened the carnage. ?If you got a CCW, carry your weapon.

Steve

Oh, Yeah. Hand gun against AK-47. Right.
How about getting rid of all guns?

That's what they thought they were doing at Virginia Tech. It was a
"Gun-Free Zone"

There was another school in Virginia that wasn't a "Gun-Free Zone".
No deaths, gun-weilding, law-abiding cirizens held criminal gunman for
police. Very few papers mentioned the fact that he was held by armed
citizens, only that citizens held him for police. With that kind of
coverage, its no wonder people don't understand the value of an armed
populace.

And with the liberals controlling the media, it's no wonder we get the
newspeak news we get.

Steve




There's NO PLACE ON EARTH that has successfully "gotten rid of all guns".
It's an unrealistic DREAM,Pure FANTASY.

Police have guns,have had them stolen,Governments have guns,also have them
stolen or "go missing".
Then there's gun smuggling;druggies often bring guns in along with illegal
drugs.Just ask the Yardies in UK.They use AK's,REAL full-auto AKs.
The Yakuza in Japan have a business of gun running.

People make and have MADE guns in home shops.A guy in Australia was making
handguns by the 100s,sold a lot of them illegally before the AUS police
caught him.They didn't recover all he sold,either.


But disarming the citizens DOES make it safer for criminals to prey on
them. Criminals are overwhelmingly for gun control and gun bans.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net