Thread: OT - Politics
View Single Post
  #51   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
J. Clarke J. Clarke is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,207
Default OT - Politics

Charlie Self wrote:
On Dec 7, 7:38 pm, Robatoy wrote:
On Dec 7, 11:24 am, Mark & Juanita wrote:



Renata wrote:
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:08:42 -0700, Mark & Juanita
wrote:


Lew Hodgett wrote:


"Mark & Juanita" wrote:


What, exactly, as a woman do you think she represents?


Someone who has a serious chance to break thru the glass
ceiling
of American politics as practiced by the good Old Boys Club".


Gotta be scary as the devil for them.


What a condescending thought. So just because she's a woman
you
think conservatives are afraid of her?


That is the equivalent of saying that libs are scared of Ann
Coulter just
because she is a woman who is doing well in what was formerly a
man's world of political discourse.


Being a screech owl is hardly the same as being prez.


I agree. Hillary's screech and cackle would scare just about
anybody. Certainly doesn't make her presidential.


Or for that matter that all libs would be for Kay Bailey
Hutchison because
she is a woman breaking through the glass ceiling of American
politics.


i.e, conservatives aren't concerned about Hillary because she
is
a woman,
they are concerned about Hillary because she has shown herself
to
be strongly corporatist, in bed with the same folks who brought
you the forthcoming economic meltdown..
(I fixed your post).


DON'T do that, I don't want that kind of stuff showing up in the
archives. I did not write the above. Listening to her speeches,
particularly to the kook fringe base, she leans very heavily
socialist. Period.


Renata


--
If you're going to be dumb, you better be tough


Look, somehow that bitch has been given the taste of blood in her
fangs. Some schmuck has convinced her that she can be a big as
Bill.
She's running with the hope she can show up her husband.
That is what gives her life. Other than that she's dead.

We'll run the risk of nuclear war every 28 days?


Double the timing we've had with Bush?


So when during the past 8 years has there been a real risk of nuclear
war? The closest would have been the day the Towers fell and then I
recall a lot of people demanding that the Middle East be nuked into
slag and Bush being one of the voices of reason.

--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)