View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
Peter Crosland Peter Crosland is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 758
Default Building Notice or not

Peter Lynch wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 20:48:21 -0000, Peter Crosland wrote:
Martin Carroll wrote:
What are the consequences of not notifying Building Control about
notifiable work?

Plumber friend of mine is putting in a unvented system (he has the
qualification to do this) and asked me if I knew what the would
happen if he didn't put the building notice in.


If the property owner tries to sell the property (s)he will be asked
for proof that the work has been authorised. If the owner cannot
produce the documentation then they will have to pay to get it
inspected and approved. It is much easier and cheaper to get it done
according to the rules.


Isn't it up to the potential buyer to decide whether to just go ahead
anyway?
Obviously their solicitor will huff and puff and say you've _got_ to
provide the paperwork, but can't the buyer just ignore that.


In theory yes but it would be stupid to do so.

Peter Crosland