On 2007-12-03, Harold and Susan Vordos wrote:

Iggie's post is a great example of the benefits of running tools at the
appropriate surface speed. For the uninitiated, it contains very useful
information and doesn't warrant the ridicule of anyone. If some find it a
bit elementary, please keep in mind that many turn to this forum for good
and useful information----so anything that can't be construed as
misinformation should be welcomed with open arms.


There was definitely a difference between how the strands would strike
the material, between 1/2 HP 1725 RPM and 1 HP 3450 RPM. It works
markedly better. It is also nice to notice that this McMaster brush,
does not seem to lose strands.

i